Spanish Grammar Guide

Past Perfect Subjunctive (e.g.: yo hubiera hablado)

On this page: Description, Questions, Exercises

Description

An Overview of the Past Perfect Subjunctive:

The past perfect subjunctive is used in the same way as the past perfect to refer to a previous event with relevance for another past event. The difference is the past perfect subjunctive is preceded by a subjunctive trigger, e.g.: Prefería que no hubiera comprado ese suéter. It is also used to express the meaning "should/would have+past participle", e.g.: Yo hubiera escrito una carta a mi abuelita pero no tuve tiempo.

How to Form the Past Perfect Subjunctive

The past perfect subjunctive is formed by using the imperfect subjunctive form of the auxiliary haber and a past participle, e.g.: Fue horrible que no hubieran aprendido la verdad.


The following table shows the different subject forms of haber with the past participle of decir.

Subject past perfect subjunctive of haber past participle of decir
yo  hubiera dicho
hubieras dicho
él/ella/usted hubiera dicho
nosotros hubiéramos dicho
vosotros hubiérais dicho
ellos/ellas/ustedes  hubieran dicho

 

How to Use the Past Perfect Subjunctive

Just as other forms of the subjunctive, the past perfect subjunctive is required in the presence of particular "triggers". Here are some of the most common verbs that trigger past perfect subjunctive when they are conjugated in the past (preterite or imperfect): querer quegustar que, dudar que, lamentar que, e.g.: Queríamos que nos hubiéramos quedado en la playa.

Here are some common verbs that trigger the past perfect subjunctive when in the past (preterite or imperfect):

  • dudar que, desear que, esperar que, exigir que, gustar que, insistir que, necesitar que, pedir que, preferir que, prohibir que, proponer que, querer que, recomendar que, sugerir que, temer que, e.g.: Jorge dudaba que el político hubiera dicho la verdad. ("Jorge doubted that the politician would have told the truth.")

Other expressions that trigger the subjunctive in the subordinate clause are:

  • fue/era bueno que, fue/era dudoso que, fue/era importante que, fue/era mejor que, fue/era necesario que, fue/era preferible que, fue/era una lástima que, tenía/tuve miedo de que, para que, a menos que, en caso (de) que, antes (de) que, sin que, e.g.: Era importante que ustedes hubieran llegado a tiempo. ("It was important that you had arrived on time.")

Image result for cuidado

The Past Perfect Subjunctive in si Clauses 

The past perfect subjunctive is also required after si when the conditional perfect is in the main clause, e.g.: No me habría hecho un tatuaje si hubiera costado más de $100. Remember that it is always the past perfect subjunctive that occurs after si while the conditional perfect NEVER occurs after si.

The Past Perfect Subjunctive to Express "would/should have"

The past perfect subjunctive is also used to express the meaning "would/should have+past participle", e.g.: hubieras traído comida al parque ("You should have brought food to the park.")  

Questions

Questions about the Past Perfect Subjunctive

Q:  Why is it Quería que tú hubieras dicho and NOT Quería que tú habías dicho or Quería que tú hayas dicho?

The verb querer, here in the past (imperfect) requires the use of the past perfect subjunctive in the subordinate clause, not past perfect indicative or present perfect sunjunctive.

Q: Why is it ... después que lo había hecho and NOT ... después que lo hubiera hecho?

The expression después que is followed by the indicative, while antes que is followed by the subjunctive. This makes sense because we can be more certain about events after they happen than before. With después que, it is implied the event occurred which requires the indicative.

Q: Why is it Creía que habías venido and NOT Creía que hubieras venido?

The verb creer is followed by the indicative in affirmative (positive) sentences, but followed by the subjunctive in negative ones (the idea being that there is less certainty in the latter case), e.g.: No creía que hubieras venido.

 Q: Why is it Nopensaba que lo hubiera sabido and NOT No pensaba que lo había sabido?

The verb pensar is followed by the subjunctive in negative sentence and indicative in affirmative (positive) ones (the idea being that there is certainty/assertion, rather than doubt, in the positive case), e.g.: Pensaba que lo había sabido.

Q: Why is it Yo haría la tarea si la hubiera traído a casa and NOT Yo hubiera hecho la tarea si la haría traído a casa?

Remember that it is ALWAYS the past perfect subjunctive that occurs immediately after si, NEVER the conditional perfect.

Q: Why is it Nosotros hubiéramos ido a Guatemala and NOT Nosotros habíamos ido a Guatemala to express "should/would have+past participle"?

Use the past perfect subjunctive to express the hypothetical situation/opinion implied. The past perfect means that you actually DID go to Guatemala.

 

Exercises

Write the correct form of either the past perfect or the past perfect subjunctive. These examples do not have the intended meaning "should/would have+past participle."

Era bueno que nosotros (comer) antes del viaje.
En la mañana mi madre ya (preparar) el desayuno.
El profesor quería que los estudiantes (hacer) toda la tarea.
Ayer fui al parque y vi que alguien (cortar) el pasto.
La reunión fue crítica para que tú (saber) las reglas.

Tags: imperfect past subjunctive

Search the Guide: